“Pell-Mell”, by Tom Wolfe

I like the structure Tom Wolfe used for his essay. In the introduction paragraph the author briefly tells readers what the essay will be about. He introduces the names of the main characters, describes the conflict that happened between them, the location the conflict took place and further aftermath. So, after reading the first paragraph we already involved in the story and aware of what is going on.

            In the next four paragraphs Tom Wolfe thoroughly describes the events that happened on December 2^nd, 1803, giving a lot of specific details which make readers vividly visualize the scenario of that evening.

            The last paragraphs of the essay discuss the outcomes of the pell-mell that took place in the White House. The author tells about Jefferson’s implementations and how they influenced the status of the United States throughout the history.            

            I enjoyed reading the essay written by Tom Wolfe. It turned out to be very interesting and educational for me. “Pell-Mell” is the essay that demonstrates the connection between ancient incident and up-to-date order of things in the US.

            As far as Jefferson’s behavior that day in the White House is concerned, I believe he acted disrespectful and dishonorable to the guests from Great Britain. Even though he thought all people were equal, he should have been more attentive and caring to the Merrys, because this was not the indicator of Jefferson’s freedom and equality-loving views but the indicator of politeness and good breeding.

"Terrorism and the Media"

Before reading the article “Terrorism and the Media,” by the Council on Foreign Relations I had absolutely opposite opinion about this topic. I honestly, believed there was insignificant link between these two concepts. Evidently the author knows how to make strong argument.

            One of the things that make the essay strong, I believe, is its structure. The author broke down his essay into 10 independent parts, each of which deals with a concrete pressing issue. The essay doesn’t based on the author’s own views and opinions, instead it supported with quotes and ideas of various scholars, journalists and experts. The answers that the author gives to every question are capacious and complete at the same time. They start with a short answer, like yes or no, and after they deepen in details, provide examples and interpret debatable positions of experts.

            In my opinion, the interview structure of the essay, frequent referral to different scholars and author’s brief, precise responds make the essay very strong and meaningful. The essay, I think, can certainly appeal to the unfriendly audience and be able to make the audience look at the topic from different perspective or even change their minds completely.